|
|
|
Greetings
It's official! The 2005 NAAFA Convention will be in the San
Francisco Bay Area, for the first time ever. Kudos to Heather
Boyle for negotiating a great rate with the hotel. Read on for
more info.
|
|
|
|
|
2005 NAAFA
Convention: Big Summer Fun! |
|
The 2005 NAAFA convention will be held in the San Francisco
Bay Area on August 10 to 14. Specifically, it will be at the
San
Mateo Marriott, about 8 miles south of the San Francisco
airport. These dates are official, and we have signed the
contract with the hotel, so start making your plans now.
Convention coordinator Heather Boyle was able to negotiate
our lowest hotel rates in years: $75/night plus tax for a
deluxe room, or $90/night for an executive suite. These rates
are available from August 4th to the 15th, for those who want
to spend some extra time in the area. Call 1-800-556-8972 and
request the NAAFA room block, or go to www.sanmateomarriottcom
and use group code NAANAAA for the deluxe room or NAANAAB for
the executive suite. If you have any trouble booking your
room, please contact Heather at NAAFA2005@aol.com for
assistance.
We are seeking workshop presenters, speakers and books
people want to promote. We are planning an Activism track as
well as health information and movement from a Health at Every
Size (HAES) perspective. Contact Frances White at frances_white@naafa.org
if you want to participate or have someone to suggest for the
convention.
Pricing for the convention packages has not been firmed up
yet, but keep checking at www.bigsummerfun.com
for the latest updates.
|
|
|
|
|
Activism!
NAAFA Protests Casino's Weight Control
Policy |
|
Oakland, CA - National Association to Advance Fat
Acceptance (NAAFA) strongly condemns the new weight control
policy set forth by the Borgata Hotel Casino in Atlantic City,
New Jersey. The new policy states that cocktail servers and
bartenders who gain more than 7% of their baseline weight (for
a person of 130 pounds that would be 9 pounds) will be
suspended until they lose the weight or be fired. This policy
is a flagrant act of discrimination against people of size and
particularly against women as this group is predominantly
women.
Policies such as this are directly responsible for creating
undue stress in the workplace, which can lead to a myriad of
serious health risks such as eating disorders, anxiety
disorders, elevated blood pressure and heart disease,
gastrointestinal disorders and more.
NAAFA strongly urges individuals to take action by writing
letters of protest to Borgata and their parent company, Boyd
Gaming. Hit them where it will hurt the most, in their
pocketbooks, by taking your business elsewhere until the
Borgata is forced to reverse their policy. Cancel any existing
reservations you have at any Boyd Gaming facility if at all
possible and make certain that they know you are cancelling
because of the new weight control policy at the Borgata.
Other properties owned by Boyd Gaming include the Barbary
Coast, the Stardust, Sam's Town, California Hotel, Eldorado,
Fremont, Gold Coast, Jokers Wild, Main Street Station,
Southcoast and Suncoast Hotel and Casinos in Nevada. In
Louisiana they own Delta Downs Race Track, Sam's Town
Shreveport and Treasure Chest in New Orleans. Other properties
include Sam's Town, Tunica in Mississippi, Par-A-Dice Hotel
& Casino in Illinois and Blue Chip Hotel & Casino in
Indiana as well as Vacations Hawaii.
You can send an electronic message to Boyd gaming and any
of their properties at: www.boydgaming.com,
or, for greater impact, mail a letter to their corporate
offices at 2950 Industrial Road, Las Vegas, NV 89109. Address
letters to Robert L. Boughner, the Chief Executive Officer of
Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa.
|
|
|
|
|
NAAFA Merit
Scholarship 2005 |
|
Award Amount: $500 Deadline Date: July 1,
2005 (Scholarship winner to be announced at the National
Convention in California.)
The NAAFA Merit Scholarship Essay Contest is open to NAAFA
members (of at least 12 months) who are furthering their
education at a community/junior college, college or university
during the 2005/2006 school year.
Applicants must write a 700 to 1000 word essay on one of
the following topics:
- How NAAFA Has Changed My Life and Personal Education
Goals
- The Importance of Fat Acceptance in the Year 2005
- Personal Fat Activism
- Another fat related topic on approval
In addition to the $500 merit scholarship awarded, the
winner will also receive a free membership renewal to
NAAFA for one year. Essays will be judged on relevance,
creativity and clarity, as well as grammar, writing mechanics
and structure.
Contact Kara
Brewer Allen for more info. |
|
|
|
|
Fitness
Column: Where Do You Stand? |
|
by Rochelle Rice, MA President, In Fitness
& In Health
The USDA just released the new movement/exercise
requirements for Americans. The report indicates that
"90-minutes of exercise per day will produce weight loss." The
question then becomes "How do I fit that into my life?"
If you have been a champion at yo-yo dieting or purchasing
exercise equipment from infomercials that goes untouched week
after week, then it is time to redefine where you stand and
what you truly want in life. Passion can be the driving force.
When I ask people what they are passionate about, I often
meet a blank stare. Passion? What is it? Where do I get it?
What does it feel like? Sometimes the word is linked
synonymously with sexuality, but trust me, there are many
things and causes to be passionate about!
The word passion may feel like lifting a 100 pound free
weight, so let's start slow. Take a moment and write down
three things that make you happy. Where do you feel them in
your body? Take your time and try and feel the excitement in
your body as you think of these three things. Feel how it has
shifted your body. If you can't think of anything that makes
you happy today, rest, and come back to this at another time.
We all want to feel healthy, have a lot of energy and live
a full life - but without passion and a sense of excitement
from your body, your mind will find it difficult to kick into
gear to hit your goals.
So, the government has once again issued this new set of
guidelines for the American people. But have they ever asked
"What are you passionate about?" Perhaps that would shift the
driving force that would link pleasure with your daily
movement. |
|
|
|
|
The
Challenges of Succeeding in a Weight-Based
Harrassment/Discrimination Claim |
|
by JaCina N. Stanton Ms. Stanton is currently
in her final year of law school and plans to practice law in
Washington, D.C.
Recent studies suggest employers view fat people as less
competent, successful, and intelligent than their co-workers.
Employers often relegate fat workers to second class status
when promotions and raises arise. These and numerous other
examples of discrimination serve as indicators that the
struggle of fat Americans should be comparable to other
minorities.
Most claims based on harassment or discrimination are
brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which
currently does not recognize overweight individuals as a
protected class. Title VII makes it "an unlawful employment
practice for an employer . . . to discriminate against any
individual with respect to his compensation, terms,
conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such
individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment also
offers equal protection for protected groups, usually
minorities, under the law.
To have a valid weight harassment or discrimination claim
today, a claimant would have to choose one or more of the
following courses of action: (1) file a federal claim under
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or Rehabilitation
Act; (2) file a claim under state or local law (3) file an
Equal protection claim; (4) lobby politicians to recognize fat
people as a protected class covered by federal law claims.
ADA/Rehabilitation Act Federal Disability
Claim Individual federal courts have held that
harassment based on weight is actionable under the ADA and the
Rehabilitation Act, and have analyzed such cases in accord
with Title VII hostile work environment cases. Since only
obese claimants usually succeed, overweight individuals have a
more difficult time of using the ADA and Rehabilitation Act
because they are not viewed as disabled. To be considered
disabled under the ADA one must possess: (A) a physical or
mental impairment substantially limiting one or more major
life activities, (B) a record of the impairment, or (C) being
regarded as having such an impairment. Viewing weight as a
disability may be a double-edged sword because it makes weight
an impairment, which it often is not.
Perhaps Greene v. SEC, Inc. best illustrates a
successful weight harassment claim because the claimant was
able to prevail under an obese disability claim. Greene,
considered morbidly obese by the court, sued his employer
under the Florida Civil Rights Act and the ADA, which
prohibits disability discrimination. The plaintiff alleged
that his employer denied him a promotion because he was
disabled by obesity, harassed, and discriminated against due
to threats of demotion for failure to lose weight. His
supervisor also forced him to purchase diet cookies while
constantly deriding him about his weight.
In Underwood v. Trans World Airlines an overweight
flight attendant, terminated because she exceeded the
airline's weight guidelines, was not found to be obese by the
court. She was found not to qualify as being disabled under
the New York Human Rights Law or the ADA, because obesity is a
disability, while being fat is not.
In Butterfield v. New York State, the plaintiff was
a police officer who described numerous instances of
weight-based harassment. Butterfield filed a successful claim
under the ADA due to obesity after his co-workers placed
laxatives in his beverage to induce weight loss.
State Law Claims Some states have recognized
weight discrimination and harassment as a recognizable claim.
Michigan is currently the only state to recognize overweight
individuals as a protected class. Local ordinances in
California and Washington, D.C. allow personal appearance
harassment claims. The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act states
that an employer "shall not . . . discriminate against an
individual with respect to employment . . . because of
religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height,
weight, or marital status.
Equal Protection Clause The Equal Protection
Clause is a possible alternative, but has not been heavily
tested as often as other federal and state statutes because
fat people are not viewed as a protected class.
Lobbying for a Federal Claim For a person to
recover under Title VII, which is currently the most
comprehensive discrimination statute, it should recognize
weight-based forms of harassment and discrimination. Since
most federal laws do not recognize weight-based harassment or
discrimination and do not see fat people as a protected class,
claims have often gone unrecognized. Due to the increased
harassment of fat Americans, lobbying national politicians to
add weight as a protected class, under certain conditions,
should be the ultimate goal.
Suceeding in a claim for weight harassment or
discrimination may seem a daunting challenge. However, if
states, and ultimately the U.S. begin to follow the example of
Michigan, perhaps millions of harassed fat Americans will
eventually have a plausible legal remedy. |
|
|
|
|
In Memoriam:
MaryAnn Valerio |
|
MaryAnn Valerio passed away on February 5th, 2005 from
complications of Gillen Barre Syndrome. She was 54. She was
formerly Co-Chairperson of the New Jersey NAAFA Chapter and
has many friends who still are members. Her service to NAAFA
and size acceptance is appreciated and she will be greatly
missed by her friends and family. |
|
|
|
|
Book Review:
FAT - The Anthropology of an Obessession |
|
Book Edited by Don Kulick and Anne Meneley Reviewed by
Terri L. Weitze
The first question that comes to mind in reading this book
is what is anthropology? In the introduction of FAT, we
are told it is the study of human cultures. Anthropologists
conduct their studies by living among the people they want to
know about. By observing and talking to people over a long
period of time and in a wide range of contexts, they believe
they will be better able to understand the people and their
culture.
Sounds like a good idea. We who live in the fat community
might enjoy some understanding from the non-fat world. If the
anthropologists who contributed the essays that comprise the
book FAT have come to such an understanding, I did not detect
it from reading FAT. However, I do think I came to a better
understanding of anthropologists. What I found most
interesting in reading the essays in FAT that actually deal
with being fat, it seemed that the anthropologists are subject
to the same biases and prejudices regarding fat and fat people
that are so prevelant in our society. What is interesting is
that some of the anthropologists recognized these prejudices
and admitted to them; most did not.
There are several chapters dealing with "fat" as a noun,
i.e. lard and olive oil, rather than as an adjective. I didn't
find these chapters very interesting. Anthropologists are
supposed to study cultures, and while food is a major part of
most cultures, I am more interested in the people.
I became frustrated with the fact that all of the authors
felt that being fat was equivalent to being unhealthy. There
was a real lack of understanding of fat culture; the essays
seemed to be about non-fat culture's attitude about fat
people. Non-fat culture's attitude about fat people is
something that the fat community is well educated in.
However, I must admit there were some interesting ideas in
the book. The essay entitled "Porn", which deals with the
concept of feeders and feedees was very interesting and I felt
relatively non-judgmental. And while the essay on "Chasers"
(i.e., chubby chasers), while containing some of the most
biased writing concerning fat people and people who love them,
did have one tidbit of wisdom concerning the power of the FA
over those they admire.
There is one chapter written by a fat person about the fat
community. Every other essay has a one word title - of course,
that is not enough for the fat person. Her essay is titled
"Pissed Off". It seems Allyson Mitchell is the only essayist
in FAT who is not an anthropologist; in her bio she is
described as a teacher of Feminism Activism and maximalist
visual artist. Her essay is a view of fat culture from within
- interesting, but again, a subject with which many fat people
are already informed. While Ms. Mitchell's chapter has some
great information in it about becoming a fat activist, I am
not sure it is worth buying the whole book FAT to get that
information. Allyson Mitchell does have a website at www.AllysonMitchell.ca;
however, when I tried to check it out it appeared to be very
much a work in progress.
|
|
|
| |